Project Management Service, Energy Management Services, Exergy Audit, Energy Audit Service, Mumbai, India

Energy Conservation Consultants, Thermal & Electrical Energy Audit, Water Audit, Safety Audit, Project Management Service, Energy Management Services.

" Energy Saved Is Profit Earned "
 

Case Study.......

INTRODUCTION :
Boiler is the most commonly found energy equipment in the industry.   Performance of the boiler system not only affects the fuel consumption directly, but also, at times controls the production output and quality of product. The Steam system comprises of following components:

Steam generation : Boiler
Steam Distribution system : Pressure reducing stations, steam traps, steam piping and insulation.
Steam Utilization system : End use equipment that consumes steam.

Normally the energy conservation activity in steam system starts from steam generation and concludes with steam distribution. It has been our observation that the maximum energy saving potential is in the steam utilization system. This may sound little absurd, but is definitely logical. The Case study series is carefully designed to identify and evaluate the impact of Energy conservation activity in each of the systems. The Cases selected are from Energy Audit studies conducted in various industries and represent a true real life picture of energy conservation potentials. Boilers are generally classified under three categories:

  • Non – IBR (or coil type boilers)
  • Package (or smoke tube IBR boilers)
  • Large water tube boilers

Though the classification is based on the IBR regulations, it has a greater significance from energy conservation angle. The energy conservation opportunities associated with each of the above boilers are different, so are the problems faced by the end users.

We have incorporated the case studies classifying them under the above headings. The facts and figures are from actual field study measurement whereas names of the company are not mentioned to maintain secrecy.

STEAM GENERATION SYSTEM :

The first and foremost activity to be conducted in the energy management program is to evaluate the boiler efficiency. Format for collecting data for boiler efficiency is enclosed as Appendix I and the Work sheet for evaluating boiler efficiency from the collected Data. Fortunately the efficiency evaluation procedure for all the boilers is same regardless of its classification.

Following is the boiler efficiency test conducted on a non-IBR boiler.

BOILER EFFICIENCY EVALUATION CALCULATIONS (850 kg/hr)

Ultimate Analysis of fuel (w/w):

Type of fuel F.O.  
C: 82.98  %
H: 12.38  %
S: 2.77  %
N2: 1.12  %
O2: 0.74  %
Moisture: 0.01  %
Ash: 0.00  %
Specific Gravity of fuel 0.92  kg/m3
Gross Calorific value of fuel 9944  kcal/kg f
Fuel Temperature 115  °C
Flue gas analysis (v/v): Before Eco. After Eco.
CO2 % 14.00% 13.00%
N2 83.00% 83.00%
O2 % 3.00% 4.00%
(Actual Measurements of CO2% from observations)

Indirect Efficiency Test

Average feed water temp. 74.00  °C
Average Steam Pressure 10.50  kg/cm2
Average combustion Air temp. 29.00  °C
Flue gas temp. Before Eco. 450.00  °C
Flue gas temp. After Eco. 210.00  °C
(Actual measurements of temperature from observation table)
  Before Eco. After Eco.
Air ratio 1.17 1.24
Actual wet flue gas (kg/kg F) 15.27 16.38
Flue gas temperature 450.00 210.00
 
% Dry gas loss 15.45 % 7.12 %
% Wet gas loss 7.81 % 6.47 %
Radiation losses 2.00 % 2.00 %
 
Efficiency of boiler (Indirect) 74.74 % 84.40 %

Direct Efficiency Test

Tank dimensions Water Oil
-Length 124 120
-Width 298 120
-Height 124 90
Volume of tank 4.582048 1.296
Calibration factor 36.952 14.4
 
Drop in level 53 8.1
Actual consumption during test 1958.46 116.64
Evaporation Ratio

16.79 

lt. of water / lt. of oil
 

18.25 

kg of water / kg of oil
Heat balance across boiler
 
Average feed water temp. 74.00  °C
Average Steam Pressure 10.00  kg/cm2
Feed water temperature at economizer inlet 40.00  °C
 
Enthalpy of saturated steam at above pressure 664  kcal / kg
Enthalpy of water at boiling 185.6  kcal / kg
 
Enthalpy of steam at the above evaporation ratio

409.00 

 
 
Quantity of saturated steam

62.16 

%
Quantity of water carry over

37.84 

%
 
Actual Efficiency of boiler on dry saturated steam

67.03 

%
Heat loss in hot water

7.72 

%
 
Heat gain in economiser 6.21  %
Heat loss in feed water tank 3.45  %
 
Useful heat available to process 72.90  %

Comments: Though the boiler efficiency of 84% by indirect method shows that the performance of boiler is very good.   However, due to the design of non-IBR boilers, there is lot of heat wastage from water carry over and wet steam.  This is normally not accounted in the plant efficiency evaluations.  The contribution of economiser diminishes as the feed water temperature increases due to condensate recovery.  That is the reason why Useful heat to process is as low as 72.90% against the Indirect boiler efficiency of 84.40%  

Tuning of boiler Boiler efficiency test for both the boilers was carried out during the Energy Audit study. Major findings  of the test before are as follows:

PARTICULAR 850 kg/hr boiler 600 kg/hr boiler
Average fuel consumption 40 lt./hr 31 lt./hr
Net Heat available to process 74.80% 75.07%
Efficiency of steam generation
Heat loss in moisture separator
WHR in Economizer Loss in the FW tank
67 %
7.72%
8.2%
1.5%
69.37%
7.44%
6.50%
Nil

Boiler Tuning: During he Energy Audit study, boiler tuning was done, 
the tuning of boiler has led to following results:

PARTICULARS 850 kg/hr 600 kg/hr
  Before Tuning After Tuning Before Tuning After Tuning
CO2 % 13 13 8 11
Temperature at boiler outlet 450°C 370°C 450 °C 370°C
Temperature at Economiser outlet 210°C 180°C 270 °C 210°C
Net useful heat available to process 74.80 % 78.97 % 60.0 % 75 %

This tuning of boiler is expected to reduce the fuel bill by around 5 to 10% depending upon the operating hours of the boilers. This tuning is done by reducing the fuel quantity and optimizing the air to fuel ratio. Normally, the plant operators change the settings arbitrarily. It is, therefore, necessary to do this exercise periodically.

The minimum monetary saving expected is Rs. 1.5 Lacs per annum.

WASTE HEAT RECOVERY FROM THERMOPAC STACK :

The Thermic fluid heater burner has a capacity of 1 Lac kCal/hr (corresponding to 10 kg/hr LPG firing.). Flue gas temperature is 300°C & flow rate is 302 M3/hr.

It is therefore proposed to tap heat content in flue gases by installing Waste Heat Steam Generator in the stack.

align="justify">WASTE HEAT RECOVERY ECONOMICS:
1. Qty of gases through vent (V2) = 302 M3/hr
2. Temp. of gases through vent (V2) = 300°C
3. Gases can be safely cooled to 150°C  
4. Waste Heat recovery potential = 302 X 0.25 X (300-150) X 1.2
   = 13600 kcal/hr

Steam qty.(@3 kg/cm2 ) that can be generated through the available 
Waste Heat

  = 13600/(650-30)
  = 22 kg/hr
Saving on low pressure steam = 22 X 0.60 X 8,000
@ Rs. 0.6/kg steam cost. = Rs. 1,05,000 per year
Total saving out of proposed system    
Total = Rs. 1,05,000/Year
Investment Proposed = Rs. 60,000
Pay Back Period = 7 Months

Comments: Though the Thermopac capacity and quantity of steam generated are very small, the payback period is very attractive. The same logic can be extrapolated to any size of Waste Heat Recovery system.

STEAM DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:

The steam distribution system comprises of the following components:

    1. Moisture separator
    2. Pressure reducing station
    3. Piping and its insulation
    4. Steam traps  
All of the above distribution system components contribute largely to efficient plant operations. The effect of individual component on the overall efficiency is very hard to determine.

Following are some of the hard facts regarding steam losses in various components of Steam Distribution system.

Leakage:

Steam Pressure Steam kg/year FO kg/year Rs./Year
Hole Dia of 1/10 Inch
7 kg/cm2)

50,880

4,070.4 42,780
21 kg/cm2

1,20,000

9,600 1,00,896
Hole Dia of 1/8 Inch
7 kg/cm2) 2,03,636 16,291 1,71,217
21 kg/cm2 4,80,000 38,400 4,03,584
Hole Dia of 3/16 Inch
7 kg/cm2) 4,58,182 36,655 3,85,244
21 kg/cm2 10,80,000 86,400 6,84,874
Hole Dia of 1/4 Inch
7 kg/cm2) 8,14,545 65,164 9,08,064
21 kg/cm2 19,20,000 1,53,600 16,14,336
Basis : F. O. Price = Rs. 10.5 per kg
Operating hrs = 8,000 hrs per year
Steam Ratio = 12.5 kg of steam per kg FO

Loss Due To Improper Insulation

Steam Temp. Rs./M2/Year
> °C Lagging Thickness
  Bare 1 Inch ½ Inch 2 Inch 2 ½ Inch 3 Inch 4 Inch
38 1590 265 185 - - - -
65 4100 662 529 - - - -
93 7810 1191 794 662 - - -
121 11910 1720 1191 926 - - -
149 17070 2249 1588 1191 1058 - -
177 23150 2778 1984 1588 1191 - -
204 30160 3308 2381 1852 1455 1191 -
232 38390 3969 2778 2117 1720 1455 -
260 47890 4631 3307 2514 1984 1720 -
316 70650 - 4234 3175 2646 2249 1720
371 99220 - - 3969 3307 2778 2117
427 34950 - - 4895 3969 3441 2646

Relation of steam velocities and pressure drop in the pipe :

 

Pipe Size Steam Pressure kg/cm2

Velocity M/Sec with pressure drop/25 Meters

    0.0175 0.035 0.0525 0.07 0.105 0.14 0.21
3 Inch Pipe 0.338 41 55 72 82 100 120 152
3 Inch Pipe 1.013 26 37 44 52 63 76 96
3 Inch Pipe 1.75 15 23 26 32 40 46 58
3 Inch Pipe 7 9 14 17 20 23 27 35
3 Inch Pipe 28 - - 9 11 12 15 18
6 Inch Pipe 0.338 67 96 122 140 168 191 229
6 Inch Pipe 1.013 4.4 58 73 91 107 123 152
6 Inch Pipe 175 24 35 44 52 61 73 91
6 Inch Pipe 7 15 21 27 32 40 46 55
6 Inch Pipe 28 - 9 14 17 20 23 29

How to read the above table : Example: For 6” pipe, at 7 kg/cm2 pressure the pressure drop in the pipe shall be:

0.0175 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length : if velocity is 15 m/s
0.0525 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length : if velocity is 27 m/s
0.21 kg/cm2 per 25 meters of running length : if velocity is 55 m/s

Case Study to elaborate the effect of insulation of flanges: 
100 ft of 6 Inch pipe 12 Flanges of 6 Inch = 5 ft of pipe length Heat loss 
in following 3 cases :

Case (I) – Bare pipe ( Bare Flanges) 
Case (II) – Pipe with 2 inch insulation aluminum cladding and bare flanges 
Case (III) – Insulated pipe and Flanges

    Case (I) Case (II) Case (III)

Heat Loss

Kcal/year 36,300 4,100 2,490

Steam Loss

Kg/Year/100ft 68 3.2

Fuel Loss

Kg/Year/100ft 55 0.26

Energy Saving Potential

Rs. Per Year/100 ft 60 2.8

Present Scenario

Boiler Capacity : 850 kg/hr (non-IBR)
Fuel consumption (LDO) : 50 liters per hour (900 liters per day)
Boiler operating hours : 18 per day
Plants to which boiler is attached : Reactor and dryers both indirect heating applications

No moisture separator installed in the line and only TD traps for drain points 
After the Moisture separator was installed in the pipeline:

Fuel consumption : 45 liters per hour (630 liters per day)
Boiler operating hours : 14 per day

Energy Conservation Potential :

Daily fuel saving : 270 liters
Annual reduction in fuel bill : Rs. 10 Lacs
Investment Required : Rs. 4,500/-

Additionally the production capacity increased due to availability 
of the production equipment for longer durations.

STEAM UTILIZATION SYSTEM : This area is most potent for energy conservation.  The application, end use utility and quality of steam are the three main points that govern energy performance of the system. Energy performance of the system can be drastically improved by close examination of the system. The energy saving is affected by following measures:

Reducing the demand of steam by modification of application system by:

  • Reduction in operating hours

  • Reduction in quantity required per hour

  • Use of more efficient technology

  • Minimizing wastage

We shall elaborate the efficiency enhancement process by suitable 
examples of each type.

CASE I:    Reduction in demand of steam in belt dryer system

System Description and present operating conditions

A belt dryer in one of the chemical industries is using steam for heating the drying air. The energy inputs to the system are:

Steam for air heating : 300 kg/hr
Electrical energy for FD : 8.5 kW
Electrical energy for ID : 3.4 kW

Initial performance parameters were established by field measurements 
and the performance was monitored for few batches. 
Following is summary of performance parameters at present conditions :

1. Air flow rate

: 17,000 kg/hr
2. Moisture evaporation load : 27 kg/hr
3. Effectiveness of dryer : 10.9%
4. Effectiveness of steam consumption : 9.5%
5. Efficiency of FD fan : 29.2%
6. Efficiency of ID fan : 26.2%

Recommendation :

Start the circulating fans in each section and cut down the blower flow rate. Replace the blower with smaller size blower.

Following is summary of performance parameters at proposed conditions:

1. Air flow rate

: 5,000 kg/hr
2. Moisture evaporation load : 27 kg/hr
3. Effectiveness of dryer : 40%
4. Effectiveness of steam consumption : 38%
5. Efficiency of FD fan : 60%
6. Efficiency of ID fan : 26.2%

Energy savings :

The energy consumption of proposed system shall be:

  • Steam for air heating : 90kg/hr

  • Electrical energy for FD : 2 kW

  • Electrical energy for FD

Steam Saving = 215 kg/hr (i.e. 72 %)
Yearly fuel Saving = Rs. 3,87,000/-
Electrical saving = 9 kW (i.e. 75%)
Yearly electrical Saving = Rs. 3,24,000/-

Comments : This is a typical example where reduction in demand by modification in the end application leads to a mammoth saving of 75%.

CASE II:    Reduction in steam demand by use of hot water in the process:

System description : Cold water is taken to the reactor and then heated to desired temperature. The average time taken for getting the desired temperature is between 1 to 2 hours. This instantaneous heat load leads to pressure drop in the boiler. Once the temperature is attended, the steam requirement is hardly anything. The hot water is then drained to ETP as there is no condensate recovery system.

Recommendation :  Hot water shall be used for the process the loss due to condensate draining is eliminated completely, and the average batch time shall reduce by 1.5 hrs.

Using the heat available in the boiler economiser can generate the hot water required for process. This shall also ensure that there is no loss of heat through the feed water tank.

It is required to increase the capacity of the tank to 10 KL and insulate the tanks. If hot water at a desired temperature is required, one steam blower can be installed that shall mix live steam with water instead of indirect heating.

Saving potential : Investment required for implementation of all the modifications shall be in the range of Rs. 45,000/-   The energy saving potential is Rs. 1,00,000/- per year

Comments :  The savings achieved in this case are due to reduction in operating hours of steam requirement and Waste Heat Recovery. It must be noted that there is a productivity improvement as the batch time is reduced by 1.5 hours.

CASE III: Reduction in steam demand by use of Multiple Effect Evaporators :

System description :  The plant has a single effect evaporator to concentrate 250 m3/day of a stream from 15% concentration to solid.   The system parameters are :

Flow rate : 250 m3/day
Initial concentration : 15%
Final concentration : 100%
Steam requirement : 275 MT/day

Recommendation and saving potentials:

There is a possibility of installing 4-effect or 6-effect or 12-effect evaporator system. The saving potentials and the investments in all the three systems is as follows :

Parameter Units 4-effect 6-effect 12-effect
Flow rate m3/day 250 250 250
Initial concentration % 15 15 15
Final concentration % 15 15 15
Steam requirement MT/day 92 70 35
Steam saving potential MT/day 183 205 240
Monetary saving Rs./year 465 Lacs 510 Lacs 600 Lacs
Investment Rs. 75 Lacs 90 lacs 110 Lacs

Comments:    This is a typical case of reduction in steam demand by use of more efficient technology. Here the investment is also proportionately high, but in the larger perspective, it pays to switch to a more efficient technology.

CASE IV:  Reduction in wastage of steam by use of thermocompressor System description :

Thermocompressors are heat pumps, where low level (low-pressure) steam is compressed by using motive steam at high pressure. In the process of compression, vacuum is also generated in the connected equipment. For evaporator applications the vapour generated in the body is compressed using thermocompressors and the discharge steam is passed to the calendria. Live steam, which was earlier fed to the calendria, shall now pass through the Thermocompressor at a higher pressure. Steam generation at higher pressure also helps improving efficiency of boiler operation.

The savings shall occur on the following accounts :

  • Reduced steam consumption

  • Elimination of Vacuum pump operation

  • Proportionate reduction in the cooling water circulation

  • Improved boiler efficiency on account of steam 
    generation at higher pressure

The following analysis shall quantify effect of each of the parameters on energy saving.

PARTICULARS UNITS  
Steam requirement Kg/hr 5500
Motive Steam Flow Rate Kg/hr 4770
Vapour suction flow rate Kg/hr 730
Discharge flow rate Kg/hr 5500
Motive steam pressure Psig sat 150
Suction pressure Inch Hg 26
Discharge pressure Psig sat 50
 
Steam saving Kg / hr 730
Fuel Saving Rs / hr 423.4
Hours of operation / yr Hrs 6000
Annual Saving

Lacs

25.404

APPENDIX I : INDIRECT BOILER EFFICIENCY TEST OBSERVATIONS 
(850 kg/hr boiler)

Observation table :

Sr. No. Time %CO2 Stack temperature Steam Pressure Oil firing Pressure Steam Temp. Ambient temp.
    Before Eco. After Eco. Before Eco. After Eco. (kg/cm2) (kg/cm2) °C °C
1 4.45 13.4 10 470 210 11 18.5 184 29
2 5.15 14.4 13.4 430 220 10 19 174 30
3 6.15 14.2 13 450 220 11 18.5 183 30
4 6.45 14 13.2 460 210 11 18.5 180 29
5 7.00 14.2 13 440 210 10 18.5 182 29
6 7.25 13.8 13 450 210 10 18.5 182 29
Avg.   14 13 450 210 10.5 18.5 181 29


DIRECT BOILER EFFICIENCY TEST OBSERVATIONS (850 kg/hr)
Observation table :
Sr. 
No.
Time Water Level Oil Level Steam Pressure Water Temp. Hour meter reading
    cm cm (kg/cm2) °C  
1 4.3 75 65.5 11 80 7424.5
2 5.3 57 62.5 10 78 7425.26
3 6.3 39.5 60 10 73 7425.95
4 7.35 22 57.4 10 65 7426.5
Avg.       10 74  
 

Drop in level

53 8.1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home | About us | Case Study | Measurements & Verification Division |
Boiler Efficency Calculator
| Contact | Response

Designed & Hosted by : MID   Promoted by : GID